COMPARATIVE-TYPOLOGICAL ANALYSIS OF EVIDENTIALITY AND EPISTEMIC MODALITY CATEGORIES IN TYPOLOGICALLY DIVERSE LANGUAGES
Authors: Xamrayeva Maxzuna Gʻayratovna
Published: March 05, 2026 • Vol. 15 Issue 9 • Views: 60
This article explores the linguistic interpretation of the
categories of evidentiality and epistemic modality. It presents
definitions and descriptions of these two categories as provided by
global scholars and analyzes contexts drawn from literary discourse.
It is noted that while evidentiality is viewed as a grammatical
category in some languages and a lexical one in others, it can also be
interpreted as a pragmatic category in Turkic languages.
Furthermore, there are languages where the category of evidentiality
has not yet been fully defined. Through evidentiality, the listener
becomes aware of the source of the information conveyed by the
speaker: whether the speaker witnessed the event firsthand, heard it,
or reached a logical conclusion based on certain evidence, and
transmits this logical perspective to second, third, and other parties.
The reality described in the message may or may not have occurred,
yet both facts are perceived by the listener as truthful information.
Not only verbs of perception but also other parts of speech, such as
adverbs, prepositions, and nouns, can actively participate in
expressing evidentiality. In this article, the categories of evidentiality
and epistemic modality in English, German, Russian, and Uzbek are
identified and analyzed within the contexts of oral speech and literary
discourse.