PUBLICATION ETHICS
Scientific Publications Ethics
The editorial policy of the scientific electronic journal “KOMPARATIVISTIKA”
(Comparative Studies) adheres to the guidelines established by reputable
international organizations, including the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE),
the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ), the Open Access Scholarly
Publishers Association (OASPA), and the Publishers and Scientific Editors
Association Declaration (ANRI) on "Moral Principles for Scientific Publications."
All parties involved in the publication process are encouraged to adhere to these
standards, which significantly impact the credibility of international journals and
publishers.
1. Introduction
1.1 The publication of scientific materials in journals is an essential method of
scientific communication, significantly contributing to knowledge development in
relevant fields. The publication process for “KOMPARATIVISTIKA”
(Comparative Studies) involves various stakeholders, including authors, journal
editors, reviewers, publishers, and members of the scientific community. Together,
they help establish ethical standards for the journal.
1.2 Publications not only provide a platform for sharing scientific advancements but
also facilitate networking and collaboration by adhering to compatibility guidelines.
2. Editor-in-Chief Responsibilities
2.1 Decision-Making
The primary goal of “KOMPARATIVISTIKA” (Comparative Studies) is to
ensure the reliability and scientific significance of the content published. Decision-
making within the editorial office involves consultation with members and reviewers
to maintain quality and objectivity.
2.2 Fair Evaluation
The Editor-in-Chief evaluates manuscripts based on intellectual merit without
consideration of authors' race, gender, religion, nationality, citizenship, or political
views.2.3 Privacy
The Editor-in-Chief and editorial board are committed to confidentiality.
Manuscripts are reviewed without disclosure of sensitive information to
unauthorized parties, ensuring integrity throughout the publication process.
2.4 Conflict of Interest
2.4.1 Manuscripts are reviewed for potential ethical violations, including
unauthorized use of personal research data. Any conflicts of interest must be
addressed prior to publication.
2.4.2 If conflicts arise among competing authors, the Editor-in-Chief may delegate
authority to a deputy or involve the editorial office to maintain impartiality.
2.5 Retractions and Corrections
If evidence emerges of incorrect statements or ethical violations, the Editor-in-Chief
will promptly issue retractions or corrections to inform readers.
2.6 Addressing Ethical Violations
In cases of alleged ethical misconduct, the Editor-in-Chief will collaborate with the
publishing house to investigate claims, engage with authors, and cooperate with
relevant organizations when necessary.
3. Reviewers' Responsibilities
3.1 Role in Editorial Decisions
Reviewers play a critical role in shaping editorial decisions and helping authors
enhance the quality of their work. They must approach their tasks seriously and
professionally.
3.2 Responsible Conduct
Reviewers should notify the editorial office promptly if additional time is needed for
revisions or if issues arise during the review process.
3.3 ConfidentialityManuscripts under review must remain confidential, and discussions with
unauthorized individuals are prohibited.
3.4 Objectivity
Reviewers must provide objective and constructive feedback, avoiding personal
criticism. Their comments should be clear, reasonable, and based on evidence.
3.5 Source Acknowledgment
Reviewers must identify relevant sources not cited in the manuscript and alert the
editor to any similarities with other published works.
3.6 Conflict of Interest
3.6.1 Reviewers must not use unpublished data for personal research without the
author's consent.
3.6.2 Reviewers must disclose any potential conflicts of interest and decline to
review if impartiality is compromised.
4. Authors' Responsibilities
4.1 Manuscript Standards
4.1.1 Authors must present accurate and complete accounts of their research,
including sufficient detail and references. Misleading statements are unacceptable.
4.1.2 Analyses and discussions must be objective and supported by evidence.
4.2 Data Availability
Authors should provide raw data upon request and ensure its availability during the
publication process.
4.3 Originality and Plagiarism
4.3.1 Authors must guarantee originality and appropriately credit all sources.
Plagiarism in any form, including paraphrasing without citation, is prohibited.
4.4 Publication Exclusivity4.4.1 Manuscripts must be submitted to one journal at a time and not published
elsewhere.
4.4.2 Republishing articles is permissible only under specific conditions, with proper
acknowledgment and consent from all parties.
4.5 Source Acknowledgment
Authors must recognize all contributions and cite relevant sources accurately.
Unauthorized use of data or unpublished materials is prohibited.
4.6 Authorship
4.6.1 Authorship should be limited to individuals who significantly contributed to
the research. Co-authors must approve the final manuscript.
4.7 Ethical Research Practices
4.7.1 Authors must disclose potential hazards in their work and ensure compliance
with ethical standards for research involving humans or animals.
4.8 Conflict of Interest
4.8.1 Authors must disclose any financial or other conflicts of interest that could
influence their research.
4.9 Error Reporting
Authors must promptly notify the Editor-in-Chief of significant errors in their
published work and cooperate in issuing corrections or retractions.
5. Publisher's Responsibilities
5.1 Supporting Ethical Standards
The publisher must assist editors, reviewers, and authors in adhering to publication
ethics and ensure that commercial interests do not influence editorial decisions.
5.2 Addressing Complaints
The publisher must support editors in addressing ethical complaints and cooperate
with other journals or organizations when necessary.5.3 Promoting Best Practices
The publisher should encourage adherence to ethical standards and provide
resources for improving publication practices.
5.4 Legal Assistance
When necessary, the publisher should provide legal expertise to address ethical or
legal challenges.